If Evolution Were Right, Earth Would Hold 10^133 People

1) The mathematical contradiction in evolutionary population models

Even the lowest growth rate produces an impossible number
We often hear that "humans evolved gradually over 300,000 years as the population grew." But check it with numbers and it immediately looks strange. Homo sapiens 300,000 years ago used fire, made tools and hunted cooperatively. Let's set the population growth rate at an extremely low 0.1 percent, meaning only one extra person per 1,000 each year. Apply 0.1 percent a year to an initial population of 5,000 for 300,000 years, and you get an impossible number: 10 to the 133rd power. That means more humans should exist today than there are atoms in the entire universe (about 10 to the 80th).

2) Ancient sapiens and modern humans are the same people

Genetics can't explain hundreds of thousands of years of stalled growth
Homo sapiens was painting religious images as early as 100,000 years ago, and their DNA differs from ours by less than 0.1 percent. Modern humans differ from each other by about 0.1 percent too, so they were simply the same humans. Yet they couldn't manage even 0.1 percent growth? Even in the 1800s, humanity grew at about 0.4 percent a year (today it's about 0.9 percent).

3) The contradiction in the "Ice Age die-off" scenario

Continuous evidence of human activity across continents clashes with the theory
Evolutionists say many died in the Ice Age. The last Ice Age lowered temperatures by about 6 degrees Celsius, and that wiped people out? (Meanwhile, evidence of human activity, including cave paintings, tools and footprints, keeps pouring in from all over Europe, Africa and the Americas, continuing through tens of thousands of years of that same Ice Age.)

4) Ice cores and the real start of human civilization

Glacial records show human burning traces within the last 10,000 years
So were volcanoes erupting nonstop for 300,000 years? Is this science or faith? Polar ice cores are among the most precise layered records there are. According to them, humanity first left the traces of its fires in the air within the last 10,000 years. That's why one suspects evolutionary models have pushed down the human growth rate far too hard, in an age with no birth control.

Conclusion: running the data backward points to biblical origins

Pure statistics, without timeline adjustments, supports a recent starting point
See also the earlier post, "Finding Adam and Eve by Running Population Growth Backward."