Would a God of Love Throw Sinners Into the Fires of Hell?
What if the hell we were taught about isn't how things really are? What if hell isn't eternal, or the people who go there are saved in the end, or the soul simply ceases to exist?
We are taught that God is a God of love and mercy, yet people live short lives and come to faith within the environment they were born into. Some never hear the gospel even once in their whole lives, some sincerely believe in another religion, and some hear it but simply cannot bring themselves to believe.
If these people suffer forever in hell because of a few decades of life, is that really the will of a good God?
In the 2,000-year history of Christianity, there have been three main views. Two of them offer hope.
1. Eternal hell: This is the most familiar view. Those who go to hell are punished forever. Leading theologians such as Augustine taught this.
2. Salvation for all: This is the view that God's love will in the end save everyone. Even if hell exists, it is seen not as an eternal prison but as a process that makes people clean. Origen in the early church leaned this way, though the church later took issue with it.
3. Annihilation of the soul: This is the view that the soul is not eternal by nature, and that eternal life is a gift God gives. Instead of suffering forever, those who are not saved simply cease to exist. It reads the words "the wages of sin is death" (Romans 6:23) literally, as "death."
This is the heaviest question.
No one has ever seen what comes after death firsthand. Yet what if people taught with full confidence, "This is the right answer," and they were wrong? What if someone's life changed because of those words?
Pascal, a mathematician and a man of faith, made this calculation. If you live believing in God and there is no God, you lose very little. But if God does exist, what you gain is infinite. So it is wise to bet on believing.
If you bring this calculation straight into the question of hell, you get an interesting result.
Whichever view of hell is right, the one who lives loving God and loving their neighbor has nothing to lose. It's the same whether eternal hell is right, salvation for all is right, or annihilation of the soul is right.
Of course, Pascal's calculation has been criticized with the question, "Is believing out of fear real faith?" But that very criticism is also the heart of this piece. Following God not because we fear hell, but because we believe He is truly good. Whichever answer is right, isn't that the safest choice, and above all, the most honest one?
Read the original (Korean) →
We are taught that God is a God of love and mercy, yet people live short lives and come to faith within the environment they were born into. Some never hear the gospel even once in their whole lives, some sincerely believe in another religion, and some hear it but simply cannot bring themselves to believe.
If these people suffer forever in hell because of a few decades of life, is that really the will of a good God?
A Theology of Hope About Hell
In the 2,000-year history of Christianity, there have been three main views. Two of them offer hope.
1. Eternal hell: This is the most familiar view. Those who go to hell are punished forever. Leading theologians such as Augustine taught this.
2. Salvation for all: This is the view that God's love will in the end save everyone. Even if hell exists, it is seen not as an eternal prison but as a process that makes people clean. Origen in the early church leaned this way, though the church later took issue with it.
3. Annihilation of the soul: This is the view that the soul is not eternal by nature, and that eternal life is a gift God gives. Instead of suffering forever, those who are not saved simply cease to exist. It reads the words "the wages of sin is death" (Romans 6:23) literally, as "death."
But What If, After Death, Hell Really Is Eternal?
This is the heaviest question.
No one has ever seen what comes after death firsthand. Yet what if people taught with full confidence, "This is the right answer," and they were wrong? What if someone's life changed because of those words?
Pascal, a mathematician and a man of faith, made this calculation. If you live believing in God and there is no God, you lose very little. But if God does exist, what you gain is infinite. So it is wise to bet on believing.
If you bring this calculation straight into the question of hell, you get an interesting result.
Whichever view of hell is right, the one who lives loving God and loving their neighbor has nothing to lose. It's the same whether eternal hell is right, salvation for all is right, or annihilation of the soul is right.
Of course, Pascal's calculation has been criticized with the question, "Is believing out of fear real faith?" But that very criticism is also the heart of this piece. Following God not because we fear hell, but because we believe He is truly good. Whichever answer is right, isn't that the safest choice, and above all, the most honest one?
